|
incontrast76 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No stunt, I live in Sydney and remember it happening
bottomfeedar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Obviously a stunt, not a genuine incident ....
Quontomleeeep (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Just trying to figure out which one of these accounts is gcmc2's new one, anybody worked it out ?
rodneys0909 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The truckie didn't fall asleep- the Benz & he changed lanes at the same time.IF & I repeat IF those infomercial promoting scumbag lowlife reporter "current affairs" douchebags weren't driving in the right lane IT WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.... simple as that. YOU MUST NOT DRIVE IN THE RIGHT LANE UNLESS OVERTAKING ON ANY ROAD OVER 80kmh....If more people followed this simple rule the roads would be much more enjoyable to use- Screw commercial TV. Police shoulda taken their licence- PARASITES
mrceebees14 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I am going to assume the guy in the truck fell asleep.
zz44ppppp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@jethrotay the truck driver is smart because he braked upon colliding with the car? what else would you expect to happen?
zz44ppppp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This perfectly demonstrates the tendency among Australian motorists of indicating AFTER beginning a manoeuvre. Indicators are primarily to indicate your intention before you make your move. It's all too common that people believe indicating, especially to change lanes, is something you do mid-move. I think people think it's cool to use minimal blinks of the indicator--it's unsafe. Use your indicator to show you're going to make a move, and keep it on until your manoeuvre is complete.
kisD100 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@nathanssss thank you
nathanssss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@kisD100 no truck is a freightliner argosy
leighko (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Either party should have just brake... |
