|
alexthasy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Gorgormcgor You cannot compare Newton to Darwin who came up with a whacko conjectural fairy tale on how species could have come into existence following an atheistic evolutionary scenario. Google speculative science and you could join a forum and who knows if your evolutionary fantasies are good enough they could be received in your Darwinian holy scriptures. Many renown scientist ignored your old defrocked priest atheist gospel.
Gorgormcgor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@alexthasy Do you believe in Newtonian physics? You're a Newtonist. What about the theory of relativity? You're an Einsteinist. What an absurd statement. The reason it isn't dogmatic is because if the evidence lead to something else then we would just believe that. That's how science works.
gotsda (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@alexthasy Species couldn't evolve? Look up speciation, its a basic principle in Biology (somthing you cannot have studied).Your obviously either stupid or ignorant.
eleminatus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@alexthasy keep 'em coming :)
alexthasy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@eleminatus A Darwinian atheist evolutionary fluke could not have created any of the species. Natural selection did it is dumb
eleminatus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@alexthasy so evolution is absurd but "god did it" is valid? Priceless! P.S. Rev Dawkins - that made me laugh so damn hard! :D
alexthasy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@eleminatus Interesting that you cannot address anything that so clearly debunks the concept of a Darwinian atheistic evolutionary creation. Darwinian Atheist theologian Rev Dawkins claim that species are designoids not intelligently designed (although they look designed) is priceless and would get a 10 on the scale of absurdity.
eleminatus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@alexthasy Im saving your replies in a text file, they are priceless. So much invented, misinterpreted and straight up false information is really funny. The whole shamanistic nonsense was gold, but this is pretty good too. Keep it up please :)
alexthasy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@eleminatus Your cult is only 150 years old. Read Carnegie conversion to it again. It is reminiscent of that of Paul after meeting Christ on the road to Damascus. What is amusing is that your cult is hiding behind scientific terminology . I could not get a clear definition on the myth of natural selection. Is she a law of science, an unverifiable theory or just one more dogmatic belief in the Darwinist gospel
eleminatus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@alexthasy this is funny :D "cultist of Darwinism", "conversion to evolutionism". This is brilliant. Convolution of words you are using is amusing. Even put a 19th century philanthropist in there as well. Who knows what for! You are funny :) |