Amagusdrop (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Creationists Why U so stupid?

parsivalshorse (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@Godspittbull It appears that petty evasion is your sole tactic, if you had any evidence I presume you would have posted it by now - rather than just whining about having to repeat yourself.

DrMadolite (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@deckard9757 Yeah but that's the big lie, isn't it? If you have any understanding of literature, you'll know that there is no such thing as just "the literal translation". Even a literal translation can be understood in multiple ways.Also, while you're most likely correct that most creationists today seem to believe that Planet Earth was created 6000 years ago, other creationists believe that "the world" is actually referring to human civilization, not the planet itself.

deckard9757 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@DrMadolite no, they're not. Creationists believe in the literal translation of the Judaic folklore known as the book of Genesis.

DrMadolite (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@deckard9757 That depends on what you're actually referring to when you believe in creationism. Some creationist theories are complimentary to evolution rather than opposing it.

DrMadolite (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Is there a reason why so much of Youtube features atheists with 80 IQ at war with creationists with 50 IQ? Do people have some innermost fetish for meaningless, futile and thus redundant debates with hyperpsychotic people?

deckard9757 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@Godspittbull I'm still waiting for your "evidence" for Creationism ...

deckard9757 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@gear14 do you seriously think that creationism is a credible alternative to the Big Bang and Evolution? That's like saying that the Stork is a credible alternative to Childbirth!

Pythol (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@suddenlyitsobvious "disingenuous"Well done, wakey!

AtheistToothFairy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@gear14:"although the facts being used don't necessarily disprove creation"And what kind of evidence do YOU require to 'disprove' this "creation" myth?